|
|
|
|
Flowchart | |
Carefully conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses are the gold
standard for establishing the effects of interventions. Consequently,
they have to be performed in the same rigorous and systematic manner as
clinical studies. There are several reasons why it is essential to
manage the review process systematically:
- No loss or distortion of
information
- Possibility to manage the large amount
of information
- Efficient conduct of the review and
no duplication of work
- Accountability and
reproducibility of the review process and
results
- Possibility to update the review when new
evidence becomes available
The process of
performing a systematic review and meta-analysis is complex. Usually,
several people are involved, sometimes across countries, and large
amounts of data have to be managed including administrative data,
bibliographic information, documents, and data extracted from study
reports included in the review. In detail, the process of performing a
systematic review includes the following
steps:
-
Developing the review protocol
- Searching reports
e.g. literature search in Medline
- Scanning for
duplicates of reports
- Screening of reports
(Title/abstract evaluation)
- Consensus on
screening
- Eligibility of reports (Fulltext
evaluation)
- Consensus on
eligibility
- Assigning reports to studies and
eligibility of studies
- Consensus on study
assignment
- Extracting data from
studies
- Consensus on extracted
data
- Import of data into dedicated
software
- Narrative
Synthesis
- Statistical
Synthesis
Given
the complexity of the process it is obvious that it is susceptible to
various errors. Database systems have the potential to help reviewers
to manage the review process and to minimize
errors.
[back]
[next]
| | |
|
|
|